 # Sensitivity vs Specificity in Machine Learning

A comprehensive guide to Sensitivity vs Specificity in Machine Learning, including how to calculate each metric and when to use each one.

Explore our new video:

## Introduction

In machine learning, there are two key measures that are used to evaluate models: sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity measures the proportion of true positives that are correctly predicted by the model, while specificity measures the proportion of true negatives that are correctly predicted. In general, a model with higher sensitivity will be better at detecting positive examples, while a model with higher specificity will be better at detecting negative examples.

## What is Sensitivity?

Sensitivity, also called the true positive rate, is a measure of how often a test correctly identifies patients with a disease. A highly sensitive test means there are few false negatives. In other words, a low number of patients with the disease are incorrectly diagnosed as being disease-free. Sensitivity is usually plotted on the y-axis (vertical axis) of a receiver operating characteristic curve.

High sensitivity is especially important in screening tests, because it reduces the number of patients who need to be further investigated. For example, if a screening test for cancer is highly sensitive, few patients with cancer will be missed. However, even a highly sensitive test will miss some patients with the disease.

## What is Specificity?

Specificity is a measure of how well a machine learning algorithm can identify positive examples, while ignoring negative examples. In other words, it measures the proportion of negative examples that are correctly classified as negative.

A high specificity means that the algorithm is good at identifying negative examples (i.e. it has low false positive rate), while a low specificity means that the algorithm is not very good at identifying negative examples (i.e. it has high false positive rate).

It is important to note that specificity is different from sensitivity, which measures the proportion of positive examples that are correctly classified as positive.

## How do Sensitivity and Specificity Work in Machine Learning?

In machine learning, sensitivity and specificity are statistical measures of the performance of a binary classification test, also known as a confusion matrix. Sensitivity is the proportion of true positives that are correctly identified, while specificity is the proportion of true negatives that are correctly identified.

In other words, sensitivity measures the ability of a model to correctly identify positive examples, while specificity measures the ability of a model to correctly identify negative examples.

Both measures are important in determining the overall accuracy of a machine learning model. However, Sensitivity vs Specificity in Machine Learning can be trade-offs. For example, a model with high sensitivity may have low specificity, and vice versa.

The ideal situation is to have a model with high sensitivity and high specificity. However, this is often not possible, and trade-offs must be made. Sensitivity and specificity are often inversely related. As one increases, the other decrease

## The trade-off between Sensitivity and Specificity

There is always a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity when designing a machine learning model. Sensitivity is the percentage of positives that are correctly identified, while specificity is the percentage of negatives that are correctly identified. In general, the higher the sensitivity, the lower the specificity and vice versa.

The ideal situation is to have a model with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, but this is seldom achievable in practice. In many cases, it is more important to have a high sensitivity so that all positives are identified, even if this means that some negatives will also be incorrectly classified. This is often the case in medical diagnosis, for example, where it is more important to err on the side of caution and identify all possible cases of disease, even if this means that some healthy individuals will also be incorrectly diagnosed.

## How to choose the right Sensitivity and Specificity for your Machine Learning model

Sensitivity and specificity are two important measures used to evaluate the performance of a machine learning model. Sensitivity measures the proportion of true positives that are correctly identified, while specificity measures the proportion of true negatives that are correctly identified. In other words, sensitivity measures the ability of the model to correctly identify positive instances, while specificity measures the ability of the model to correctly identify negative instances.

The choice of sensitivity and specificity depends on the application. For example, in a medical diagnosis application, it is usually more important to have high specificity, so that false positive results (i.e. healthy patients being diagnosed as sick) are minimized. On the other hand, in a security application, it is usually more important to have high sensitivity, so that false negative results (i.e. security breaches that are not detected) are minimized.

In general, there is a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity: the higher one is, the lower the other will be. This trade-off can be represented by a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The ROC curve is a plot of true positive rate (sensitivity) against false positive rate (1-specificity), for all possible thresholds. A model with perfect performance will have a ROC curve that passes through the top-left corner (i.e. sensitivity = 1 and 1-specificity = 0), while a completely random model will have a ROC curve that follows the line from bottom-left to top-right (i.e. sensitivity = 0 and 1-specificity = 1).

To choose the right sensitivity and specificity for your machine learning model, you need to think about what type of errors you are willing to tolerate and how these errors will impact your application. For example, in a medical diagnosis application, false negatives (i.e. sick patients being diagnosed as healthy) may be more serious than false positives (i.e healthy patients being diagnosed as sick), so you may want to choose a model with higher sensitivity even if it means sacrificing some specificity

## The impact of Sensitivity and Specificity on Machine Learning accuracy

The impact of Sensitivity and Specificity on Machine Learning accuracy has been a topic of debate for many years. Although there is no clear consensus, it is generally agreed that sensitivity (the ability of the model to correctly identify positive examples) is more important than specificity (the ability of the model to correctly identify negative examples). This is because, in most applications, it is more important to avoid false positives (false positives are examples that are incorrectly classified as positive) than it is to avoid false negatives (false negatives are examples that are incorrectly classified as negative).

## Case study: A real-world example of Sensitivity and Specificity in Machine Learning

In machine learning, sensitivity and specificity are important measures to consider when developing and evaluating models. Sensitivity is the true positive rate – the proportion of positive examples that are correctly classified as positive by the model. Specificity is the true negative rate – the proportion of negative examples that are correctly classified as negative by the model.

In this blog post, we’ll explore a real-world example of sensitivity and specificity in machine learning, using data from a financial institution.

The data contains information on customers who have been offered a financial product, and whether or not they accepted the offer. The goal is to develop a machine learning model that can predict whether or not a customer will accept an offer.

The metrics we’ll use to evaluate the model are sensitivity and specificity. We want our model to be able to accurately predict both positives (customers who accept the offer) and negatives (customers who do not accept the offer).

When training our model, we’ll use different values for the threshold (the point at which we classify a customer as “positive” or “negative”). By changing the threshold, we can change the sensitivity and specificity of our predictions.

For this study, we’ll use a logistic regression model. This type of model is well suited for binary classification tasks (tasks where there are only two possible outcomes).

We’ll train our model on 70% of the data, and then test it on the remaining 30%. This is a standard procedure in machine learning – by training and testing on different data sets, we can get an accurate estimate of how our model will perform on new data.

We’ll start by training our model with a threshold of 0.5 – that is, we’ll classify any customer with a predicted probability of accepting an offer greater than 0.5 as “positive”, and any customer with a predicted probability less than 0.5 as “negative”. This gives us a baseline against which to compare other values for the threshold.

Next, we’ll try changing the threshold to 0.4 – this will result in more customers being classified as “positive”, but also more false positives (customers who are predicted to accept an offer but do not). We can see that this results in a decrease in specificity, but an increase in sensitivity.

## Conclusion

Finally, it is important to remember that both sensitivity and specificity are important when choosing a machine learning algorithm. It is also important to have a clear understanding of what each metric measures in order to make an informed decision.